Comments on: New Stack Shots http://www.ubercharged.net/2007/11/23/new-stack-shots/ Tales of Team Fortress 2 pwnage and other hilarity Fri, 16 May 2008 05:34:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Anon http://www.ubercharged.net/2007/11/23/new-stack-shots/#comment-167 Anon Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:13:24 +0000 http://www.ubercharged.net/2007/11/23/new-stack-shots/#comment-167 @Frosty Never mind the fact that none of the screens show any gross imbalance? Look at the scores, none of them show the stacked team with a significant lead over the non-stacked team. I'll agree that stacking is wrong when the stacked side has multiple people that are 20 points higher than the top person on the other side and their team is up by 2 points or more. Until then, people need to stop whining :P @Frosty

Never mind the fact that none of the screens show any gross imbalance?

Look at the scores, none of them show the stacked team with a significant lead over the non-stacked team.

I’ll agree that stacking is wrong when the stacked side has multiple people that are 20 points higher than the top person on the other side and their team is up by 2 points or more. Until then, people need to stop whining :P

]]> By: FrostyCoolSlug http://www.ubercharged.net/2007/11/23/new-stack-shots/#comment-152 FrostyCoolSlug Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:28:50 +0000 http://www.ubercharged.net/2007/11/23/new-stack-shots/#comment-152 Surely stacking doesn't count if they are the ones paying for the server? All three of those, the server name matches the tags of the players who are stacking.. If you're paying for the server, you have the right to do whatever the hell you want with it. Surely stacking doesn’t count if they are the ones paying for the server? All three of those, the server name matches the tags of the players who are stacking..

If you’re paying for the server, you have the right to do whatever the hell you want with it.

]]>